Passing exam with AP-215 latest training materials

A technical architect is provided with the logic and Opportunity file shown below:
The opportunity status logic is as follows:
For the opportunity stages "Interest", "Confirmed Interest" and "Registered", the status should be "Open".
For the opportunity stage "Closed", the opportunity status should be closed Otherwise, return null for the opportunity status.

Given the above file and logic and assume that the file is mapped in the OPPORTUNITIES Data Stream type with the following mapping:
"Day" - "Created Date"
"Opportunity Key" + Opportunity Key
"Opportunity Stage" - Opportunity Stage
A pivot table was created to present the count of opportunities in each stage. The pivot table is filtered on Jan 11th. What is the number of 'opportunities in the Confirmed Interest stage?

• A. 1
• B. 3
• C. 0
• D. 2

An implementation engineer is requested to extract the second position
of the Campaign Name values.
The Campaign values consist of multiple delimiter types, as can be
seen in the following example:
Campaign Name: Ad15X2w&Delux_wal90
Desired value: Delux
Which three harmonization methods will achieve the desired outcome?

• A. Mapping formula
• B. Calculated Dimensions
• C. Data Fusion
• D. Vlookup 0
• E. Patterns

An implementation engineer has been provided with 4 different source files: 03m 48s
1. Twitter Ads ~
2. Creative Classification
3. Placement Classification
4, Campaign Category Classification
The main source is Twitter Ads (which includes various fields and KPIs), and the rest are classification files that connect to Twitter Ads and enrich different fields within it.
The connections between the files are described as follows:
1st Party Creative Classification
File structure/headers:

Creative ID - links back to Creative Key (Twitter Ads)
1st Party Placement Classification by
File structure/headers:

• A.
  
• B.
  
• C.
  
• D.
  

Your client has provided sample files of their data from the following data sources:
Google Campaign Manager

Below are the requirements from the client and additional information:
* The sources are linked to each other by shared Media Buy names.
* In addition to the mutual Media Buys, the sources contain campaign and site values. However, the client would like to see the campaign/site values coming from Google CM and not from Google DV360.
* The source of truth for cost is Google DV360
Which action(s) are needed to take place in order to meet the client's requirement and set Google DV360 as the source of truth for Cost?

• A. Unmap 'Cost' in Google DV360
• B. Set Update Attributes and Hierarchies' as the Data updates Permissions for Google DV360
• C. Unmap 'Cost' in Google Campaign Manager
• D. Set 'Inherit Attributes and Hierarchies' as the Data updates Permissions for Google DV360

Source 3:

Via the harmonization Center, the Client has created Patterns and applied a classification rule using source 2.
While performing QA, you have spotted that the final value of clicks for Product Group Ais 10, where it should've been i5.

How can an implementation engineer fix this discrepancy?

• A. Upload both source 1 and 3 to the same data stream type in order to be able to generate Patterns from them.
• B. Toggle the 'Structure Compliant' OFF.
• C. Leave the "Case Sensitive" checkbox in the data classification unchecked
• D. Uncheck the "Case Sensitive" checkbox in the data classification